Re: BTW LONG: how about Oracle itself ?

From: Tanel Põder <change_to_my_first_name_at_integrid.info>
Date: Tue, 11 May 2004 18:19:14 +0300
Message-ID: <40a0eef3$1_2@news.estpak.ee>

> You guys realize, of course, that Oracle always will store long
> columns at the physical end of the row, no matter where you place it
> in the definition.

Note that there is an exception - when you add columns to a table already having a long column, the new ones will be placed *after* the long column in physical row.

Tanel.
http://integrid.info Received on Tue May 11 2004 - 10:19:14 CDT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Sybrand Bakker: "Re: SYS and SYSTEM password"
Previous message: Niall Litchfield: "Re: Features not supported in oracle 9.2"
In reply to: Scott Martin: "Re: BTW LONG: how about Oracle itself ?"
Next in thread: Dusan Bolek: "Re: BTW LONG: how about Oracle itself ?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

Original text of this message

HOME | ASK QUESTION | ADD INFO | SEARCH | E-MAIL US